Библиография

1. 1. Арзамасцев А.А., Арзамасцева Л.В. Геохимические индикаторы эволюции щелочно-ультраосновных серий палеозойских массивов Фенноскандинавского щита // Петрология. 2013. Т. 21. № 3. С. 277–308. https://doi.org/10.7868/s0869590313020027
2. 2. Арзамасцев А.А., Беляцкий Б.В. Эволюция мантийного источника Хибинского массива по данным Rb-Sr и Sm-Nd изучения глубинных ксенолитов // Докл. АН. 1999. Т. 366. № 3. С. 387–390.
3. 3. Арзамасцев А.А., Ву Ф. U-Pb геохронология и изотопная (Sr, Nd) систематика минералов щелочно-ультраосновных массивов Кольской провинции // Петрология. 2014. Т. 22. № 5. С. 496. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869590314050021
4. 4. Арзамасцев А.А., Дальгрен С. Глубинные минеральные ассоциации в породах даек и трубок взрыва Палеозойской щелочной провинции Балтийского щита // Геохимия. 1993. № 8. С. 1132–1142.
5. 5. Арзамасцев А.А., Митрофанов Ф.П. Палеозойские плюм-литосферные процессы в Северо-Восточной Фенноскандии: оценка состава первичных мантийных расплавов и условий магмогенерации // Петрология. 2009. Т. 17. № 3. С. 324–336.
6. 6. Арзамасцев А.А., Каверина В.А., Полежаева Л.И. Дайковые породы Хибинского массива и его обрамления. Апатиты: КНЦ АН СССР, 1998. 86 с.
7. 7. Арзамасцев А.А., Беляцкий Б.В., Травин А.В. и др. Дайковые породы в Хибинском массиве: связь с плутоническими сериями, возраст, характеристика мантийных источников // Петрология. 2005. Т. 13. № 3. С. 295–318.
8. 8. Арзамасцев А.А., Арзамасцева Л.В., Жирова А.М., Глазнев В.Н. Модель формирования Хибино-Ловозерского рудоносного вулкано-плутонического комплекса // Геология рудн. месторождений. 2013. № 55. С. 397–414. https://doi.org/10.7868/s001677701305002x
9. 9. Арзамасцев А.А., Веселовский Р.В., Травин А.В. и др. Палеозойский толеитовый магматизм в кольской провинции: ареал распространения, возраст, связь со щелочным магматизмом // Петрология. 2017. Т. 25. № 1. С. 46–70. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869590316060029
10. 10. Арзамасцев А.А., Иванова А.А., Сальникова Е.Б. и др. Возраст и происхождение субщелочных магматических серий Хибино-Ловозерского комплекса // Петрология. 2024. Т. 32. № 3. C. 291–313. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869590324030024
11. 11. Голубева И.И., Ремизов Д.Н., Бурцев И.Н. и др. Флюидоэксплозивные ультрамафиты дайкового комплекса Среднего Тимана и их парагенетическая связь с карбонатитами // Региональная геология и металлогения. 2019. № 80. С. 30–44.
12. 12. Григорьева Л.В., Савицкий А.В. Новые данные о щелочных лампрофирах северо-восточного обрамления Хибинского массива // Докл. АН СССР. 1979. Т. 248. № 6. С. 1400–1403.
13. 13. Зак С.И., Каменев Е.А., Минаков Ф.В. и др. Щелочной Хибинский массив. Л.: Недра, 1972. 176 c.
14. 14. Калинкин М.М., Козырева Л.В., Ефимов М.М. и др. Трубки взрыва Онежско-Кандалакщской зоны в восточной части Балтийского щита // Прогнозирование месторождений полезных ископаемых на Кольском полуострове. Апатиты: КНЦ АН СССР, 1985. 94–100 с.
15. 15. Карандашев В.К., Хвостиков В.А., Носенко С.Ю., Бурмий Ж.П. Использование высокообогащенных стабильных изотопов в массовом анализе образцов горных пород, грунтов, почв и донных отложений методом масс-спектрометрии с индуктивно-связанной плазмой // Заводская лаборатория. Диагностика материалов. 2016. Т. 82. № 7. С. 6–15.
16. 16. Козырева Л.В. К минералогии эруптивных брекчий Хибинского массива // Новые данные по минералогии магматических и метаморфических комплексов Кольского п-ова. 1986. С. 10–15.
17. 17. Корешкова М.Ю., Левский Л.К, Иванников В.В. Петрология нижнекоровых ксенолитов из даек и трубок взрыва Кандалакшского грабена // Петрология. 2001. Т. 9. № 1. С. 89–106.
18. 18. Кухаренко А.А., Булах А.Г., Ильинский Г.А. и др. Металлогенические особенности щелочных формаций восточной части Балтийского щита // Тр. Ленингр. об-ва естествоиспыт. 1971. Т. 72. № 2. С. 280.
19. 19. Носова А.А., Ларионова Ю.О., Веретенников Н.В., Юткина Е.В. Корреляция неопротерозойского вулканизма Юго-Восточного Беломорья и Западного Урала: новые данные об изотопном возрасте базальтов Солозера (Онежский грабен) // Докл. АН. 2008. Т. 418. № 6. С. 811–816.
20. 20. Петрографический кодекс России магматические, метаморфические, метасоматические, импактные образования. СПб.: ВСЕГЕИ, 2009. 193 с.
21. 21. Сазонова Л.В., Лебедева Н.М., Носова А.А. и др. Особенности состава оливина из магматической брекчии (трубка взрыва г. Намуайв, Хибинский массив) // Щелочной и кимберлитовый магматизм Земли и связанные с ним месторождения стратегических металлов и алмазов. 2023. С. 351–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.37614/978-5-91137-500-3.071
22. 22. Стифеева М.В., Сальникова Е.Б., Носова А.А. и др. U-Pb (ID-TIMS) возраст граната из айлликитов Кольской щелочной провинции // Докл. АН. 2023. Т. 509. № 2. C. 225–229. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686739722602782
23. 23. Arzamastsev A.A., Bea F., Glaznev V.N. et al. Kola alkaline province in the Paleozoic: Evaluation of primary mantle magma composition and magma generation conditions // Russian J. Earth Sci. 2001. V. 3. P. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2205/2001ES000054
24. 24. Arzamastsev A.A., Ivanova A.A., Salnikova E.B. et al. Age and origin of the subalkaline magmatic series of the Khibiny–Lovozero Complex // Petrology. 2024. V. 32. P. 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869591124700024
25. 25. Beard A., Downes H., Vetrin V. et al. Petrogenesis of Devonian lamprophyre and carbonatite minor intrusions, Kandalaksha Gulf (Kola Peninsula, Russia) // Lithos. 1996. V. 39. P. 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937 (96)00020-5
26. 26. Beard A.D., Downes H., Hegner E. et al. Mineralogy and geochemistry of Devonian ultramafic minor intrusions of the southern Kola Peninsula, Russia: implications for the petrogenesis of kimberlites and melilitites // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1998. V. 130. No 3. P. 288–303.
27. 27. Beard A.D., Downes H., Mason P.R.D., Vetrin V.R. Depletion and enrichment processes in the lithospheric mantle beneath the Kola Peninsula (Russia): Evidence from spinel lherzolite and wehrlite xenoliths // Lithos. 2007. V. 94. P. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2006.02.002
28. 28. Bühn B., Rankin A.H. Composition of natural, volatile-rich Na-Ca-REE-Sr carbonatitic fluids trapped in fluid inclusions // Geochim. Cosmochim. Actа. 1999. V. 63. P. 3781–3797.
29. 29. Cas R.A.F., Hayman P., Pittari A., Porritt L. Some major problems with existing models and terminology associated with kimberlite pipes from a volcanological perspective, and some suggestions // J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2008a. V. 174. P. 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.031
30. 30. Cas R.A.F., Porritt L., Hayman P., Pittari A. Pyroclast formation processes during explosive kimberlite eruptions // 9th International Kimberlite Conference. Frankfurt. Extended Abstract. 2008b. V. 9. https://doi.org/10.29173/ikc3279
31. 31. Dalton H., Giuliani A., Phillips D. et al. A comparison of geochronological methods commonly applied to kimberlites and related rocks: Three case studies from Finland // Chem. Geol. 2020. V. 558. 119899.
32. 32. Field M., Scott Smith B.H. Textural and genetic classification schemes of kimberlites: a new perspective // 7th International Kimberlite Conference. Extended Abstracts. Cape Town, South Africa. 1998. P. 214–216. https://doi.org/10.29173/ikc2687
33. 33. Foley S.F., Ezad I.S. Melting of hydrous pyroxenites with alkali amphiboles in the continental mantle: 2. Trace element compositions of melts and minerals // Geosci. Front. 2024. V. 15. No 1. 101692.
34. 34. Foley S.F., Ezad I.S., Shu C., Förster M.W. Melting of amphibole-apatite-rich metasomes in the continental mantle and comparison of melt compositions with natural igneous rocks // Lithos. 2025. V. 500–501. 107976.
35. 35. Fowler A.C., Scheu B., Lee W.T., McGuinness M.J. A theoretical model of the explosive fragmentation of vesicular magma // Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2009. V. 466. P. 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0382
36. 36. Furman T., Graham D. Erosion of lithospheric mantle beneath the East African Rift system: geochemical evidence from the Kivu volcanic province // Lithos. 1999. V. 48. No 1–4. P. 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-4937 (99)00031-6 
37. 37. Gernon T., Brown R., Tait M., Hincks T. The origin of pelletal lapilli in explosive kimberlite eruptions // Nature Communicat. 2012. V. 3. P. 832. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1842
38. 38. Giordano D., Russell J.K., Dingwell D.B. Viscosity of magmatic liquids: A model // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008. V. 271. P. 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.038
39. 39. Griffin W.L. Lherzolite Nodules from the Fen Alkaline Complex, Norway // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1973. V. 38. P. 135–146.
40. 40. Grützner T., Prelević D., Berndt J., Klemme S. The origin of Na-alkaline lavas revisited: new constraints from experimental melting of amphibole-rich metasomes + lherzolite at uppermost mantle pressure // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2023. V. 178. No 10. P. 73.
41. 41. Gurusinga M.A., Ohba T., Harijoko A., Hoshide T. Characteristics of ash particles from the maar complex of Lamongan Volcanic Field (LVF), East Java, Indonesia: How textural features and magma composition control ash morphology // Volcanica. 2023. V. 6. P. 415–436. https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.06.02.415436
42. 42. Haddock D., Manya S., Brown R.J. et al. Syn-eruptive agglutination of kimberlite volcanic ash // Volcanica. 2020. V. 3. P. 169–182. https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.03.01.169182
43. 43. Holmes A. Principles of Physical Geology. New York: Ronald Press Company, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035894509446436
44. 44. Huang F., Xu J.F., Liu Y.S. et al. Re-Os isotope evidence from Mesozoic and Cenozoic basalts for secular evolution of the mantle beneath the North China Craton // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2017. V. 172. P. 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-017-1342-4
45. 45. Ivanikov V.V., Rukhlov A.S., Bell K.F. Magmatic evolution of the melilitite-carbonatite-nephelinite dyke series of the Turiy Peninsula (Kandalaksha Bay, White Sea, Russia) // J. Petrol. 1998. V. 39. P. 2043–2059. https://doi.org/10.1093/PETROJ%2F39.11-12.2043
46. 46. Jones T.J., Russell J.K., Brown R.J., Hollendonner L. Melt stripping and agglutination of pyroclasts during the explosive eruption of low viscosity magmas // Nature Communicat. 2022. V. 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28633-w
47. 47. Junqueira-Brod T.C., Brod J.A., Thompson R.N., Gibson S.A. Spinning droplets – a conspicuous lapilli-size structure in kamafugitic diatremes of southern goiás, Brazil // Rev. Bras. Geociênc. 1999. V. 29. P. 437–440. https://doi.org/10.25249/0375-7536.199929437440
48. 48. Kalashnikov A.O., Konopleva N.G., Pakhomov-sky Ya.A., Ivanyuk G.Yu. Rare earth deposits of the Murmansk region, Russia — a review // Econom. Geol. 2016. V. 111. P. 1529–1559. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.111.7.1529
49. 49. Kargin A.V. Geochemistry of mantle metasomatism related to formation of kimberlites in the northern East European Platform // Geol. Ore Deposits. 2014. V. 56. P. 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701514060038
50. 50. Kargin A.V., Nosova A.A., Postnikov A.V. et al. Devonian ultramafic lamprophyre in the Irkineeva–Chadobets trough in the southwest of the Siberian Platform: Age, composition, and implications for diamond potential prediction // Geol. Ore Deposits. 2016. V. 58. P. 383–403.
51. 51. Kargin A.V., Sazonova L.V., Nosova A.A. et al. Phlogopite in mantle xenoliths and kimberlite from the Grib pipe, Arkhangelsk province, Russia: Evidence for multi-stage mantle metasomatism and origin of phlogopite in kimberlite // Geosci. Front. 2019. V. 10. P. 1941–1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.006
52. 52. Kargin A., Bussweiler Y., Nosova A. et al. Titanium-rich metasomatism in the lithospheric mantlebeneath the Arkhangelsk Diamond Province, Russia: insights from ilmenite-bearing xenoliths and HP-HT reaction experi-ments // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2021. V. 176. P. 101.
53. 53. Kempton P.D., Downes H., Neymark L.A. et al. Garnet granulite xenoliths from the Northern Baltic Shield — the underplated lower crust of a Palaeoproterozoic large igneous province? // J. Petrol. 2001. V. 42. No 4. P. 731–763.
54. 54. Kogarko L.N. Alkaline magmatism and enriched mantle reservoirs: Mechanisms, time, and depth of formation // Geochem. Int. 2006. V. 44. P. 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702906010022
55. 55. Kogarko L.N., Lahaye Y., Brey G.P. Plume-related mantle source of super-large rare metal deposits from the Lovozero and Khibina massifs on the Kola Peninsula, Eastern part of Baltic Shield: Sr, Nd and Hf isotope systematics // Mineral Petrol. 2010. V. 98. P. 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-009-0066-1
56. 56. Kokandakar G.J., Ghodke S.S., Rathna K. et al. Density, viscosity and velocity (ascent rate) of alkaline magmas // J. Geol. Soc. India. 2018. V. 91. P. 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-0827-8
57. 57. Kramm U., Kogarko L.N. Nd and Sr isotope signatures of the Khibina and Lovozero agpaitic centres, Kola Alkaline Province, Russia // Lithos. 1994. V. 32. P. 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4937%2894%2990041-8
58. 58. Kramm U., Kogarko L.N., Kononova V.A., Vartiainen H. The Kola Alkaline Province of the CIS and Finland: Precise Rb Sr ages define 380–360 Ma age range for all magmatism // Lithos. 1993. V. 30. P. 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4937 (93)90004-V.
59. 59. Larionova Y.O., Sazonova L.V., Lebedeva N.M. et al. Kimberlite age in the Arkhangelsk Province, Russia: Isotopic geochronologic Rb-Sr and 40Ar/39Ar and mineralogical data on phlogopite // Petrology. 2016. V. 24. P. 562–593. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869591116040020
60. 60. Le Maitre R.W. Igneous Rocks: А Classification and Glossary of Terms: Recommendations of the International Union of Geological Sciences Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 236 р.
61. 61. Le Maitre R.W., Bateman P., Dudek A. et al. A classification of igneous rocks and glossary of terms. Recommendations of the international union of geological sciences subcommission on the systematics of igneous rocks. Hoboken: Blackwell Science Publ., 1989. 193 p.
62. 62. Lebedeva N.M., Nosova A.A., Kargin A.V. et al. Sr-Nd-O isotopic evidence of variable sources of mantle metasomatism in the subcratonic lithospheric mantle beneath the Grib kimberlite, northwestern Russia // Lithos. 2020. P. 376–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105779
63. 63. Lefebvre N., Kurszlaukis S. Contrasting eruption styles of the 147 Kimberlite, Fort à la Corne, Saskatchewan, Canada // J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2008. V. 174. P. 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.048
64. 64. Lefebvre N., Kopylova M., Kivi K. Archean calc-alkaline lamprophyres of Wawa, Ontario, Canada: Unconventional diamondiferous volcaniclastic rocks // Precambri. Res. 2005. V. 138. P. 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2005.04.005
65. 65. Lloyd F., Stoppa F. Pelletal lapilli in diatremes – some inspiration from the old masters // Geolines. 2003. V. 15. P. 65–71.
66. 66. Lorenz V. Formation of phreatomagmatic maar-diatreme volcanoes and its relevance to kimberlite diatremes // Phys. Chem. Earth. 1975. V. 9. P. 17–27.
67. 67. Meert J.G., Walderhaug H.J., Torsvik T.H., Hend-riks B.W. Age and paleomagnetic signature of the Alnø carbonatite complex (NE Sweden): Additional controversy for the Neoproterozoic paleoposition of Baltica // Precambr. Res.  2007. V. 154. No 3–4. P. 159–174.
68. 68. Mirnejad H., Bell K. Origin and source evolution of the Leucite Hills lamproites: evidence from Sr-Nd-Pb-O isotopic compositions // J. Petrol. 2006. V. 47. No 12. P. 2463–2489.
69. 69. Mitchell R.H. Kimberlites, Orangeites, and Related Rocks. New York, London: Plenum Press, 1995. 410 p.
70. 70. Mitchell R.H. Kimberlites, Orangeites, Lamproites, Melilitites, and Minettes: А Petrographic Atlas. Ontario: Almaz Press Inc., 1997. 243 p.
71. 71. Mitchell R.H., Wu F.-Y., Yang Y.-H. In situ U-Pb, Sr and Nd isotopic analysis of loparite by LA-(MC)-ICP-MS // Chem. Geol. 2011. V. 280. Iss. 1–2. P. 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.11.008
72. 72. Moss S., Russell J.K. Fragmentation in kimberlite: Products and intensity of explosive eruption // Bull. Volcanol. 2011. V. 73. P. 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0504-x
73. 73. Nosova A.A., Kopylova M.G., Sazonova L.V. et al. Petrology of lamprophyre dykes in the Kola Alkaline Carbonatite Province (N Europe) // Lithos. 2021a. P. 398–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106277
74. 74. Nosova A.A., Sazonova L.V., Kargin A.V. et al. Mineralogy and geochemistry of ocelli in the damtjernite dykes and sills, Сhadobets uplift, Siberian craton: Evidence of the fluid – lamprophyric magma interaction // Minerals. 2021b. V. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11070724
75. 75. Nosova A.A., Kopylova M.G., Lebedeva N.M. et al. Melt sources for alkaline carbonate-bearing rocks of the Terskiy Coast (Kola Alkaline Carbonatitic Province) // Chem. Geol. 2023. V. 617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121267
76. 76. Pearce J.A. Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust // Lithos. 2008. V. 100. P. 14–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016
77. 77. Price S.E., Russell J.K., Kopylova M.G. Primitive magma from the Jericho Pipe, N.W.T., Canada: Constraints on primary kimberlite melt chemistry // J. Petrol. 2000. V. 41. P. 789–808.
78. 78. Prokopyev I., Doroshkevich A., Starikova A. et al. Petrogenesis of juvenile pelletal lapilli in ultramafic lamprophyres // Sci. Reports. 2023. V. 13. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2490695/v1
79. 79. Robert B., Domeier M., Jakob J. On the origins of the Iapetus Ocean // Earth-Sci. Reviews. 2021. V. 221. 103791.
80. 80. Rock N.M.S. The nature and origin of lamprophyres: an overview // Alkaline Igneous Rocks. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 30. Blackwell Scientific Publ., 1987. 568 p.
81. 81. Rock N.M.S. Lamprophyres. Boston: Springer US, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0929-2
82. 82. Samsonov A.V., Stepanova A.V., Salnikova E.B. et al. Geodynamics of a Breakup of Western Part of the Karelian Craton: Data on 2.1 Ga Mafic Magmatism // Petrology. 2023. V. 31. No. 6. P. 581–603.
83. 83. Internal structure andoccurrence of accretionary lapilli – a case study at LaacherSee Volcano // Bull. Vol. 1991. V. 53. No 8. P. 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00493689
84. 84. Scott Smith B.H., Nowicki T.E., Russell J.K. et al. Kimberlite terminology and classification // Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference. 2013. V. 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1173-0_1
85. 85. Scott Smith B.H., Nowicki T.E., Russell J.K. et al. A Glossary of Кimberlite and Related Тerms. Vancouver: Scott-Smith Petrology Inc., 2018. Part 1.144 p.; Part 2. 59 p.; Part 3. 56 p.
86. 86. Seghedi I., Maicher D., Kurszlaukis S. Volcanology of Tuzo pipe (Gahcho Kué cluster) – root-diatreme processes re-interpreted // International Kimberlite Conference. Extended Abstracts. 2008. V. 9. https://doi.org/10.29173/ikc3300
87. 87. Sindern S., Zaitsev A., Demény A. et al. Mineralogy and geochemistry of silicate dyke rocks associated with carbonatites from the Khibina Complex (Kola, Russia) – isotope constraints on genesis and small-scale mantle sources // Mineral. Petrol. 2004. V. 80. P. 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00710-003-0016-2
88. 88. Skinner E.M., Marsh J.S. Distinct kimberlite pipe classes with contrasting eruption processes // Lithos. 2004. V. 76. P. 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LITHOS.2004.03.044
89. 89. Sparks R.S.J., Baker L., Brown R.J. et al. Dynamical constraints on kimberlite volcanism // J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2006. V. 155. Iss. 1–2. P. 18–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2006.02.010
90. 90. Sun S.-S., McDonough W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes // Geol. Soc. London. Spec. Publ. 1989. V. 42. P. 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
91. 91. Tappe S., Foley S.F., Jenner G.A. et al. Genesis of ultramafic lamprophyres and carbonatites at Aillik Bay, labrador: a consequence of incipient lithospheric thinning beneath the North Atlantic Craton // J. Petrol. 2006. V. 47. P. 1261–1315. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egl008
92. 92. Tegner C., Andersen T.B., Kjøll H.J. et al. A mantle plume origin for the Scandinavian dyke complex: A “piercing point” for 615 Ma plate reconstruction of Baltica?  // Geochem. Geoph. Geosyst. 2019. V. 20. No 2. P. 1075–1094.
93. 93. Torsvik T.H., Smethurst M.A., Meert J.G. et al. Continental break-up and collision in the Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic — a tale of Baltica and Laurentia // Earth-Sci. Reviews. 1996. V. 40. No 3–4. P. 229–258.
94. 94. Veselovskiy R.V., Arzamastsev A.A., Demina L.I. et al. Paleomagnetism, geochronology, and magnetic mineralogy of Devonian dikes from the Kola alkaline province (NE Fennoscandian Shield) // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. 2013. V. 49. P. 526–547. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106935131303018X
95. 95. Webb K., Hetman C. Magmaclasts in kimberlite // Lithos. 2021. V. 396–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106197
96. 96. Wiest J.D., Jacobs J., Fossen H. et al. Segmentation of the Caledonian orogenic infrastructure and exhumation of the Western Gneiss Region during transtensional collapse // J. Geol. Soc. 2021. V. 178. No 3. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2020-199
97. 97. Zartman R.E., Kogarko L.N. Lead isotopic evidence for interaction between plume and lower crust during emplacement of peralkaline Lovozero rocks and related rare-metal deposits, East Fennoscandia, Kola Peninsula, Russia // Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2017. V. 172. P. 1–14.
98. 98. Warr L.N. IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols // Mineral. Magazine. 2021. V. 85. P. 291–320.